Legal Opinion
Noland v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 2, 2006No. 05-5798UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Appellant Michael W. Noland appeals from the order of the district court upholding Defendant Prudential Insurance Company’s (“Prudential’s”) decision to deny his claim for additional long-term disability benefits in this action for alleged wrongful denial of benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.
I. Background
Noland worked as a quality auditor at KPMG Peat Marwick LLP (“KPMG”), and was an eligible employee under KPMG’s employee long-term disability policy provided by Prudential.
In October 2000,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Linda Gail Calvert v. Firstar Finance, Inc., F/k/a Star Bank Corporation, and Liberty Life Assurance Company of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Pens. Plan Guide P 23922q Juanita Yeager v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gibson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007