Mutual Benefit Life-Insurance v. Commissioner of Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by the Mutual Benefit Life-Insurance Company to compel James Y. Barry, commissioner of insurance, to withdraw his disapproval of certain policy forms.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
Act No. 187, Pub. Acts 1907, is entitled: “An act establishing standard provisions and conditions to be contained in policies of life insurance issued by companies licensed to do business in this State. ” By *611section 1 of the act it is provided that no policy of life insurance shall be issued in this State unless the same shall contain twelve named provisions. By section 2 it is provided that no policy shall issue if it contain any of four named provisions. By section 4 the commissioner of insurance is given authority to disapprove the form of a policy filed with him, his action being “subject…
2Cited by11 opinions
- American National Insurance Co. v. TaborTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Eghotz v. CreechMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Murphy v. Seed-Roberts Agency, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Cleaver v. Central States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Southland Life Ins. Co. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.