Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kaufman v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided April 27, 1995No. 08-93-00391-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceLarsen, Justice

I concur in the majority opinion, its reasoning and holding, but I write to point out the vagaries of the present “docket equalization” system by which various courts of appeals are required to accept transfer cases from other courts.2 In this case, the El Paso court of appeals has been called upon to interpret the statute granting law-enforcement authority to the Metropolitan Transit Authority serving the citizens and taxpayers of Harris County. We have done so relying upon authority, not from one of the two appellate courts sitting in Houston, but from the Waco court of appeals. It seems to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lundy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  2. Vickio v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API