Legal Opinion
Ransone v. Pankey
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided March 7, 1949No. Record No. 3443PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStaples, J.
The plaintiff in error, Janie Minor Ransone, instituted this action by notice of motion for judgment against George R. Pankey, Jr., and W. Willis Thompson, defendants, to recover for personal injuries suffered by her as a result of a collision between two automobiles, one being driven by Joseph T. Lacy, in which the plaintiff was riding as a guest, and the other being driven by the defendant, George R. Pankey, Jr., alleged to be the agent of his codefendant, Thompson.
The case turns upon the legal effect of certain allegations contained in the notice of motion. It alleges that “you the said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gaines v. CampbellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- Kennedy v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- Stallard v. Atlantic Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- City of Portsmouth v. MadreySupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Curtis v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Purvy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Simmers v. DePoySupreme Court of Virginia · 1971
- Comer v. Smith's Transfer Corp. Of Staunton, Va.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Montgomery v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951