Legal Opinion

Slam Properties v. Pickett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1973No. 693PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Justice.

Suit was brought by appellant, Slam Properties, a Limited Partnership, against appellees, Dr. Paul Pickett, Jr. and Rosa McMillan, the real estate agent for Dr. Pickett, for damages for alleged breach of a written contract for the sale of real estate by appellant to Pickett, and upon an alleged escrow contract obligation of Rosa McMillan. Motions for instructed verdict by Pickett and McMillan were granted at the close of appellant’s case and judgment was rendered for Pickett and McMillan.

Appellant brings ten points contending that there was some evidence of an enforceable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Insurance v. HolmesTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Antwine v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bowles v. FickasTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Albright v. LayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Lifson v. DorfmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hudson v. WakefieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API