Byrd v. State

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In Hillman v. State, 67 Ga. App. 292 (20 S. E. 2d, 91), heádnote 1 reads: “That the name of the solicitor on the accusation was printed instead of being signed was immaterial. The affidavit upon which the accusation was based was properly signed by the prosecutor and attested by the clerk of the superior court. The accusation itself was properly signed by the prosecutor and the name of the solicitor was printed thereon. This was sufficient.” If the printed name of the solicitor was sufficient in that case, the tjrped name of the solicitor was sufficient in…