Legal Opinion

Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 27, 2020No. 3:19-cv-02098Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE LUIS BARAJAS CENTENO, Case No.: 19cv2098-L-LL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION TO COMPEL AMENDED RESPONSES 14 CITY OF CARLSBAD, et al., 15 Defendants. [ECF No. 39] 16 17 Currently before the Court is Defendants City of Carlsbad (“City”) and Jordan 18 Walker (“Walker”)’s “Consolidated Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for 19 Admissions” (“Mot.”) [ECF No. 39] and Plaintiff’s Opposition (“Opp.”) [ECF No. 41].1 20 For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. John Paul WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API