Legal Opinion

Ward v. Siano

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 2006No. Docket No. 265599PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened in accordance with MCR 7.215(J) to resolve the conflict between this case and Mazumder v Univ of Michigan Bd of Regents, 270 Mich App 42 (2006).

The Court further orders that part 11(D) of the opinion released on April 13, 2006, which addresses the applicability of the doctrine of equitable tolling in cases affected by the retroactive application of Waltz v Wyse, 469 Mich 642 (2004), is vacated. MCR 7.215(J)(5).

Appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk’s certification of this order. Appellees may file a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Waltz v. WyseMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Mazumder v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mullins v. St Joseph Mercy HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Ward v. SianoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Mullins v. St Joseph Mercy HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Ward v. SianoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API