Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Marshall County Bank v. Citizens Mutual Trust Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1934No. 7671Published

1ConcurrenceHatcher, Judge

The scant averment of material facts in the notice of motion for judgment herein disturbed me initially. It is a cardinal rule of pleading in cases on bills and notes that the declaration or other pleading must “allege facts showing plaintiff’s title or right to sue.” 8 C. J. 886. Accord: 14 Ency. Pl. & Pr. 503; 3 R. C. L. 1336; Bank v. Hysell, 22 W. Va. 142; Young v. Bray, 54 Mont. 415, 170 P. 1044; Oulvey v. Converse, 326 Ill. 226, 157 N. E. 245; Marvick v. Knight, 51 S. D. 151, 212 N. W. 866. There are a number of recitals in the notice relating to the obligation and to the duty of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Central Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Danser v. MalloneeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Deutsch v. KorsmeierIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Bank of Huntington v. HysellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Timmons v. Peoples Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API