Legal Opinion

People v. Betances

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 3, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Orders entered September 7, 2001, to the extent appealed from, reversed, on the law and the facts, defendants’ motions denied, informations reinstated, and the matters remanded for further proceedings.

The power to dismiss an accusatory instrument in the interest of justice should be exercised sparingly, only in those rare cases where there is a “compelling factor” which clearly demonstrates that conviction or prosecution of the defendant would result in injustice (see, CPL 170.40 [1]; 210.40 [1]; People v Dunlap, 216 AD2d 215, 217). We find no such compelling factor in…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DunlapAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. CrespoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. RiveraNew York Supreme Court · 1981

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SanchezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API