Legal Opinion

Bystery v. Village of Sauk City

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 11, 1988No. 87-1494PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSundby, J.

Ann Bystery was injured when the bicycle she was riding overturned on a Sauk City sidewalk. She appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her complaint against the village and its insurer for her injuries on the ground that the village is immune from liability under sec. 895.52, Stats. Because we conclude that the village is not so immune, we reverse.

Section 895.52(2)(b), Stats., provides that "[ejxcept as provided in subs (3) to (6), no owner ... is liable for any injury to ... a person engaging in a recreational activity on the owner’s property ....” Subsections (3) to (6) provide when the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. AllesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Harrison v. Middlesex Water CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Dreher v. Town of FitchburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Copeland v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Reed v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Verdoljak v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kruschke v. City of New RichmondCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  3. Lasky v. City of Stevens PointCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  4. Moua Ex Rel. Schilling v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  5. Crowbridge v. Village of Egg HarborCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API