Legal Opinion

Binks v. Farooq

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment reversed on the law and facts with costs, complaint reinstated and order granted, in accordance with the following Memorandum: In December 1981, the parties entered into a real estate contract whereby defendants agreed to purchase an apartment complex from plaintiffs. To finance their purchase, in part, defendants were required to secure a mortgage commitment on their residence by December 20. Defendants never applied for a mortgage commitment and, by letter dated December 18, advised plaintiffs that they were cancelling the contract because they did not have a mortgage commitment.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. M. O'Neil Supply Co. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Cohen v. KranzNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Wigand v. . Bachmann-Bechtel Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Levine v. TrattnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Tator v. SalemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. P.A. Bergner & Co. v. MartinezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. Blask v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Advanced Safety Systems NY, Inc. v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. D'Agnese v. SpinelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Matzkowitz v. PrinceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API