Legal Opinion

Bigsby v. Bates

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided December 5, 1978No. 333830PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitlatch, J.

This matter comes before the court on the. motion of the defendant, by and through his counsel, for blood grouping tests and for such tests to be taxed as costs and on the memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s motion submitted by counsel for the complainant.

Counsel for the defendant alleges that the defendant is indigent and that he does not have nor can he obtain the necessary costs of blood tests which are required to be paid in advance to the Court by the movant pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules of the Common Pleas Court, Juvenile Court Division of Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Counsel for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State ex rel. Wise v. ChandOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Walker v. StokesOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Smith v. LautenslagerOhio Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. P. V. v. L. W.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Pv v. LwNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API