Antone v. Hoffman

On Motion for a Rehearing.

Appellant insists that the calls for distance should control in this case because the natural objects mentioned as marks in the original survey were not to be found. As supporting that proposition, he refers to a former decision of this court in Braumiller v. Burke, 173 S. W. 610. The judgment of this court in that case was reversed by the Supreme Court. See Braumiller v. Burke, 112 Tex. 387, 247 S. W. 501. However, we still have no doubt as to the correctness of that proposition as applied to the facts of that case. The evidence that the call for distance did not…