Legal Opinion

Voigt Brewery Co. v. Donovan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order setting aside a stipulation for discontinuance. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

McGrath, 0. J.

In February, 1894, John Toben, by Mary Raymond, his general guardian and next friend, commenced a suit in the circuit court for the county of Wayne against relator to recover for negligent injury. After the cause was at issue, said Mary Raymond settled with relator, receiving $250, and giving a receipt in full. After the proposition of settlement was made, said Mary Raymond filed her petition as general guardian in the probate court, asking for authority to settle the matter in consideration of the payment aforesaid, and an order approving such settlement was made by the probate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lyon v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Parker v. BlightonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. Cheboygan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Tyler v. the Superior CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1909
  3. Thompson v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Simon v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API