Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 28, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN B. SANBORN, District Judge.
The suit of the plaintiff against the defendant was originally brought in the district court of Yellow Medicine county, Minn.; to recover for personal injuries under the federal Employers’ Liability Act (Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665) Dahl & McDonald, the interveners, appeared as the plaintiff’s attorneys. A petition for removal of the ease to the United. States District Court of the District of Minnesota, on the ground of diversity of citizenship, was made and denied. Subsequently the defendant settled with Thompson for the sum of $14,000. Dahl & McDonald then…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Dickinson v. StilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Davis v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Holloway v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Miner v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harlan v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Truong Ex Rel. Truong v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
- United States v. GassDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
- Thompson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
- Independent School District No. 5 of Tulsa County v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017