Legal Opinion

Querques v. City of Jersey City

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 31, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, J.S.C.

The nature of criminal charges filed against an acquitted police officer whose legal counsel now seeks reimbursement of his fees and expenses from the municipality is at the heart of one of the issues presented by cross-motions for summary judgment. A secondary issue concerns counsel’s entitlement when neither he nor his predecessor of record agreed to the city’s fee schedule in advance of entering upon their duties. The resolution of both issues invoke the provisions of the relevant statute, N.J.S.A. 40A:14-155, and a review of the decisional law which has interpreted and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. MahoneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Van Horn v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Fredericks v. Board of HealthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  4. City of Asbury Park v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Valerius v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Querques v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Oches v. Township of Middletown Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Oches v. Township of Middletown Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API