Legal Opinion

Motors Insurance Co. v. Isadore

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1969No. 2753PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal for the reason that plaintiff appellant failed to file a narrative of facts prior to the lodging of the record in this court by the Clerk of the City Court. See LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2131. The correctness of the trial court’s judgment in this case depends upon the missing testimony.

No transcript was made of the evidence taken at the trial on the merits, nor, so far as the record shows, was any effort made by appellant to secure a written narrative of the facts, either by joint agreement of the parties or by the trial court if the parties could not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State in the Interest of La FauciLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Imhoff v. ImhoffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Motors Insurance Co. v. IsadoreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API