Legal Opinion
State v. Tembruell
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1957No. 33590PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence entered upon the verdict of a jury, in which the defendant was found guilty of the crime of grand larceny for having knowingly received stolen property.
Appellant assigns as error the court’s instruction No. 5, which reads as follows:
“The word ‘knowing’, as used in the information, does not mean absolute, personal and certain knowledge on the part of the defendant that the property mentioned in the information had been stolen; it means such knowledge and information on the part of the defendant, at the time he did buy or receive or aid in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. DingesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. RedwineWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. HartwigWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. RubensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ShippWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Tembruell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. ReynoldsWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. RobideauWashington Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.