Denison v. Schooner Appelonia
New York Supreme Court
THE proceedings in this cause were removed by ccrtio ?'«ri from the Court of Common Pleas of Jefferson county. jyn attachment was issued, under the act of the 10th of Au- ’ gust, 1798, (1 N. R. L. 130. sess. 22, ch. 1.) and the ^ amending the same, passed February 28, 1817, (sess. 40. ch. 60.) against the schooner Appelonia, for labour and materials furnished for the said vessel, at SacJcetfs ....
Read the full summary
THE proceedings in this cause were removed by ccrtio ?'«ri from the Court of Common Pleas of Jefferson county. jyn attachment was issued, under the act of the 10th of Au- ’ gust, 1798, (1 N. R. L. 130. sess. 22, ch. 1.) and the ^ amending the same, passed February 28, 1817, (sess. 40. ch. 60.) against the schooner Appelonia, for labour and materials furnished for the said vessel, at SacJcetfs .... Harbour, lhe president, directors and company of the Bank of Utica, as owners of the vessel, pleaded, 1. JVonassumpsit. 2. That as to one hundred and twenty-five dol1117. lars and four cents, part…
1Per curiam
The first act (10th of August. 1798, 1 N. R. *195L. 130.) gives a lien on the ships and vessels of non-resident owners, and contains a general provision, “ that the lien shall cease immediately after such ship or vessel shall have left this state.” (s. 5.) It also provides that the owner may give bonds with sureties, to satisfy the demands, and then the ship “ shall be discharged from the attachment, and be permitted to proceed on her voyage.” (s. 4.)
The amendatory act of February 28, 1817, (sess.40. c. 60.) extends the provisions of the first act to, vessels owned by-persons resident in this…
2Cited by1 opinion
- The AlidaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1848