Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Farish & Sons

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1926No. 16921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwoeth, J.

1. The first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complains of the admission of certain documentary evidence, but, as the evidence is not set forth in the ground nor attached thereto as an exhibit, this ground can not be considered. Carson v. State, 23 Ga. App. 535 (3) (98 S. E. 187).

2. There is np merit in the other special ground of the motion.

3. The evidence demanded a verdict for the defendant, and the court did not err in directing such a verdict, nor in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eckman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  2. Carson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. City of LaGrange v. PoundsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Davis v. McKenzie Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Grier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Beard v. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API