Patterson v. Farish & Sons
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodwoeth, J.
1. The first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complains of the admission of certain documentary evidence, but, as the evidence is not set forth in the ground nor attached thereto as an exhibit, this ground can not be considered. Carson v. State, 23 Ga. App. 535 (3) (98 S. E. 187).
2. There is np merit in the other special ground of the motion.
3. The evidence demanded a verdict for the defendant, and the court did not err in directing such a verdict, nor in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eckman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Carson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- City of LaGrange v. PoundsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Davis v. McKenzie Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Grier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Beard v. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.