Legal Opinion

Town of Somerset v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and application granted, in accordance with the following memorandum: Respondents’ conversion of their property from a bargain store to a diner constituted a change of a nonconforming use under the town’s zoning ordinance for which a variance was required (Matter of Off Shore Rest. Corp. v Linden, 30 NY2d 160). In granting the variance the town’s requirement that respondents obtain a use variance with conditions was warranted. The record indicates that two conditions imposed by the town were violated. Moreover, since respondents…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MTR. OFF SHORE REST. CORP. v. LindenNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Wolfram v. AbbeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Town of North Hempstead v. De FeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rudolf Steiner Fellowship Foundation v. De LucciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Proskin v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Board of Commissioners v. Board of Zoning & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Brewer v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Rudolf Steiner Fellowship Foundation v. De LucciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API