In re Miller
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Judge.
One of the reviews deals with the question of whether the amended intervening involuntary petition of James Easely sufficiently sets forth a provable claim fixed as to liability and liquidated as to amount within the meaning of Sec. 59, sub. b of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 95, sub. b. The Referee certifies that there was no contradiction in the evidence and that from such evidence he found and concluded that the provable debt was such as to satisfy the requirements of the statute.
From a consideration of the matter, as certified by the Referee, the question seems to be a…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Electric Furnace Co. v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
- In re Pauline's Fashion SalonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954