Legal Opinion

In re Miller

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 21, 1942No. 57358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Judge.

One of the reviews deals with the question of whether the amended intervening involuntary petition of James Easely sufficiently sets forth a provable claim fixed as to liability and liquidated as to amount within the meaning of Sec. 59, sub. b of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 95, sub. b. The Referee certifies that there was no contradiction in the evidence and that from such evidence he found and concluded that the provable debt was such as to satisfy the requirements of the statute.

From a consideration of the matter, as certified by the Referee, the question seems to be a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Electric Furnace Co. v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
  2. In re Pauline's Fashion SalonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API