Flanary v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.
The plaintiff in error was convicted of unlawfully transporting ardent spirits, upon an indictment which charged that the offense was committed on the --------------------day of.....:.........................., in the year nineteen hundred and ............. There was no demurrer or other objection to the indictment until after a verdict of conviction, which was abundantly supported by the testimony. The plaintiff in error then moved to set aside the verdict as contrary to the law and the evidence, but the motion was overruled, and this is the only error assigned.
The motion came too late.…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Livingston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Puckett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Farewell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Wolfe v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Woods v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.