Legal Opinion

In the Interest of M.W.T.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 2000No. 04-98-00754-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

Michael Wayne Terry, Sr. (“Terry”) appeals the trial court’s decree of paternity that assessed current and retroactive child support against him. Terry asserts that:

1) the trial court erred by rendering an order establishing a parent-child relationship between Terry and M.W.T. because a parent-child relationship already existed as a matter of law and the trial court lacked jurisdiction to render a paternity decree;

2) the trial court erred in ordering Terry to pay retroactive child support; and -

3) the trial court erred by ordering Terry to pay…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. CryeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jamestown Partners v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Texas Enterprises, Inc. v. Arnold Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  3. the Office of the Attorney General of Texas v. Richard Lynn ScholerTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In the Interest of A.L.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. In the Interest of W.J.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API