In the Interest of M.W.T.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
Michael Wayne Terry, Sr. (“Terry”) appeals the trial court’s decree of paternity that assessed current and retroactive child support against him. Terry asserts that:
1) the trial court erred by rendering an order establishing a parent-child relationship between Terry and M.W.T. because a parent-child relationship already existed as a matter of law and the trial court lacked jurisdiction to render a paternity decree;
2) the trial court erred in ordering Terry to pay retroactive child support; and -
3) the trial court erred by ordering Terry to pay…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. CryeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jamestown Partners v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Texas Enterprises, Inc. v. Arnold Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- the Office of the Attorney General of Texas v. Richard Lynn ScholerTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- In the Interest of A.L.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- In the Interest of W.J.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.