Legal Opinion
Lent & Graff Co. v. Satenstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 2, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Martin, J.:
Defendant Satenstein seeks to place or paint a sign on a portion of the outer wall of the building known as Nos. 406-426 West Thirty-first street in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York.
The plaintiff under a lease dated December 11, 1920, occupies the entire eleventh floor of the building. The defendant Satenstein occupies the first five floors in the same building under a lease dated May 28, 1914. Satenstein's lease was recorded on the 16th day of July, 1914, in the register’s office in the county of New York. It contains the following clause: “ The party of the second part…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lowell v. StrahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Mott v. . OppenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Tarbell v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Holt v. FleischmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Stahl Jaeger v. . SatensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 487 Elmwood, Inc. v. HassettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Fulway Corp. v. Liggett Drug Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- 721 Fruit & V. Mkt., Inc. v. Stavia LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- 721 Fruit & V. Mkt., Inc. v. Stavia LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014