Legal Opinion
Hildebrand v. Fortis Benefits Insurance
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided September 29, 2000No. 3-98-0496PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ECHOLS, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 34), to which Defendant has responded in opposition. Also pending is Defendant’s Motion to Deny Relief and to Affirm the Plan Administrator’s Decision to Deny Benefits (Docket Entry No. 37), to which Plaintiffs have responded in opposition.
*940I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Prior to the onset of his alleged disability, Plaintiff Johnny Hal Campbell worked for U.S. Air, Incorporated. On September 1, 1990, Campbell was enrolled as a participant in U.S. Air’s group long term…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Olan Jett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Medical Expense PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Pens. Plan Guide P 23922q Juanita Yeager v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carollton B. Darland v. Fortis Benefits Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- In Re CampbellDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2000
- Carollton B. Darland v. Fortis Benefits Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003