Legal Opinion

People v. Gomez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 8, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.), rendered September 29, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), robbery in the second degree (four counts), burglary in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove his identity as the perpetrator is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. JohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API