Legal Opinion

Crozier v. Read

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.

1Per curiam

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained from a collision of one of defendant’s horses with a wagon which the plaintiff was driving. On a previous trial there was a nonsuit. On appeal it was held by the late General Term that the case should have been submitted to the jury, and the judgment entered on the nonsuit was reversed. (78 Hun, 181.) In the opinion there delivered by Mr. Justice Pratt we entirely concur. The facts, as disclosed on the last trial, do not vary materially from those presented at the former trial. The decision of the General Term must,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crozier v. ReadNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haines v. KeahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Haines v. KeahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Haines v. KeahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API