Legal Opinion

Koppal v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Hartford, Conn.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1972No. 6548PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

On appeal from a denial of a motion for relief from judgment,1 this court is asked to direct the vacation of two orders granting summary judgment to appellees, and one order striking a portion of the complaint. Appellants contend that failure of their counsel 2 to pursue preparation of answers to interrogatories and to oppose the motions leading to the summary judgment orders compels the granting of relief from judgment. Our review of the record reveals sufficient confusion by counsel and the trial court judge, and misapprehension of the pleadings and the relief…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John Halverson v. Campbell Soup Company, Defendant-Third-Party and Wolfes-Jensen Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. Fond Du Lac Plaza, Inc. v. ReidDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Koppal v. TRAVELERS INDEM. CO. OF HARTFORD, CONN.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API