State, Department of Human Resources, Welfare Division v. Elcano
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the district court erred by ordering appellant to pay attorneys’ fees to respondents based on the common fund doctrine. In the action below, the district court found that solely because of respondents’ efforts, appellant will be reimbursed $196,379.96 from the State Industrial Insurance System. Thus, the district court ordered appellant to pay the attorneys’ fees from the money to be reimbursed. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant, the State of Nevada Department of Human Resources, Welfare Division (Welfare Division), administers the Nevada Medicaid…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kennedy v. WollenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Consumers League of Nevada v. Southwest Gas Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Guild, Hagen & Clark, Ltd. v. First National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1979
4Cited by1 opinion
- Turnbow v. State, Department of Human Resources, Welfare DivisionNevada Supreme Court · 1993