Legal Opinion

Foulk v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 25, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

Martha J. Foulk sued the City of Louisville to recover damages to her property, caused by the improvement of an alley adjoining her premises. At the conclusion of her evidence, the court directed a verdict in favor of the city. She appeals.

'The peremptory was given on the ground that the alley was a public one, and the city was not liable for consequential damages resulting to the property from the establishment of the original grade, as held in City of Owensboro v. Hope, 128 Ky. 524, 108 S. W. 873, 33 Ky. Law Rep. 375, 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 996, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Owensboro v. HopeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Caperton v. HumpickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  3. Dulaney v. FiggCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hofgesang v. Woodbine Avenue Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  2. Cohen v. Board of Trustees of Immanuel Baptist Church, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  3. Banks v. WilhoiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974
  4. Johnson v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API