Legal Opinion

Louisville & Interurban Railroad v. Roemmele

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 23, 1914PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

*85This action was brought by appellee to recover of appellant damages for personal injuries caused by the fall from a rack of one of its cars, in which she was a passenger, of a package which struck her upon the shoulder and arm; it being alleged in the petition, as amended, that the package fell because of the negligence of appellant, in failing to provide and maintain in the ear a rack sufficient to hold the package and prevent it from being’ thrown therefrom by the ordinary movement of the car.

There were two trials of the case in the circuit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Snead Architectural Iron WorksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Chiles v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1842
  3. McCoy v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
  4. Page v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Conn.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Denker Transfer Co. v. PughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Interstate Coal Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. KendleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API