Legal Opinion
Sizemore v. Arnold
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 20, 1995No. 49A02-9410-CV-618PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Dianna and Gilbert Sizemore appeal the trial court's entry of summary judgment that the Sizemores' bankruptcy divested them of standing to bring a medical malpractice action against Dr. Anthony Arnold. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts most favorable to the Sizemores show that in April 1991, Dianna injured her ankle at work. Dr. Arnold operated on the ankle on May 28, 1991. During that surgery, Dr. Arnold cut Dianna's sural nerve, requiring additional surgery and resulting in a permanent disability.
On July 3, 1991, about six weeks after Dianna's surgery, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. MetzlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Wickey v. SparksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Schlosser v. Bank of Western IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by33 opinions
- Goldsberry v. GrubbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Brown v. Swett & Crawford of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Stewart v. HardieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Conwell v. BeattyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Dixon v. SiwyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.