Legal Opinion

United States v. Armando Martinez-Cortez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 30, 1991No. 89-50665PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Alejandro Sigueiros-Lopez, a.k.a. Armando “Alex” Martinez-Cortez, appeals his sentence on the grounds that the Sentencing Commission violated its congressional mandate in formulating the Sentencing Guidelines and that the General Accounting Office study of the Guidelines’ potential impact was a sham. 1 We affirm.

I. PACTS

On September 6, 1989, appellant Armando Martinez-Cortez entered a plea of guilty to Count 4 of a superceding information charging possession of approximately 466.1 kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. FooteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. David Keith BelgardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward X. MondelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Jane DoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Charles HopperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Cassius L. ChinskeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Donald Lee HarperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API