Legal Opinion
United States v. Andres Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 19, 1994No. 94-50128PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
45 F.3d 437
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Andres HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-50128.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 2, 1994.*
Decided Dec. 19, 1994.
Before: GIBSON,** HUG, and POOLE, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM***
Andres Hernandez appeals his conviction and 262-month sentence, following…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Hector Hernan HoyosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. George Benitez Javier Ramirez Jose Camilo LizarragaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Sonja HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Harry Leon Smith, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996