Legal Opinion

(PC) Ardds v. Martin

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 22, 2023No. 2:20-cv-00133Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, No. 2:20-cv-0133 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. DISCOVERY AND 14 KENNETH MARTIN, et al. SCHEDULING ORDER 15 Defendants. 16 17 Defendants V. Kieu, C. Lundgren, and J. Levin (f/k/a/ Bogacs) answered the second 18 amended complaint. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery 19 shall proceed in accordance with paragraphs 1-5 of this order. In addition, the court sets a 20 schedule for this litigation. 21 Should this matter proceed to trial the court will, by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Earnest Woods, II v. Tom CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. William Raymond Klingele v. Kenneth O. Eikenberry Amos Reed Larry Kincheloe Tana Wood Mr. Gleason James Thatcher Mr. McCleanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API