(PC) Ardds v. Martin
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, No. 2:20-cv-0133 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. DISCOVERY AND 14 KENNETH MARTIN, et al. SCHEDULING ORDER 15 Defendants. 16 17 Defendants V. Kieu, C. Lundgren, and J. Levin (f/k/a/ Bogacs) answered the second 18 amended complaint. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery 19 shall proceed in accordance with paragraphs 1-5 of this order. In addition, the court sets a 20 schedule for this litigation. 21 Should this matter proceed to trial the court will, by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Earnest Woods, II v. Tom CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- William Raymond Klingele v. Kenneth O. Eikenberry Amos Reed Larry Kincheloe Tana Wood Mr. Gleason James Thatcher Mr. McCleanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.