Cromer v. Bristol West Insurance
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for judgment as a matter of law First, Cromer argues that he was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Coast breached its duty to settle by failing to offer the policy limits early on or to otherwise adopt a settlement agreement proposed by Cromer and Wilson. An insurer must settle claims promptly, fairly, and equitably once its liability becomes reasonably clear. NRS 686A.310(1)(e). "Generally, an insurer who has no opportunity to settle within policy limits is not liable for an excess judgment for failing to settle the claim." Allstate Ins. Co. v. Miller, 125 Nev. 300, 315,
2…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- International Insurance v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Lioce v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Krause Inc. v. LittleNevada Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.