Legal Opinion

Murray v. Rudolf Bass, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1996No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We reject the contention that Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment. Defendant’s submissions fail to establish a reasonable excuse for the delay and a meritorious defense to the action (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Voss Dental Lab v Surgitex, Inc., 210 AD2d 985). We agree with defendant, however, that the court erred in awarding plaintiff liquidated damages under Labor Law § Í98 (1-a). The complaint does not request liquidated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Voss Dental Lab, Inc. v. Surgitex, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Sanford v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murray v. Rudolf Bass, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API