Legal Opinion
Weinstock v. City of Plantation
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 13, 1995No. 94-2434PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
We reverse and remand for a new trial on future economic damages only. See Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89 (Fla.1995). Albeit harmless, the errors asserted in appellant’s third and fourth issues on appeal are not to be repeated. We find no reversible error on these two issues nor any of the remaining issues not discussed hereinabove and affirm as to same.
GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- De Soto v. Guardianship of De SotoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995