Legal Opinion

Weinstock v. City of Plantation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 13, 1995No. 94-2434PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We reverse and remand for a new trial on future economic damages only. See Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89 (Fla.1995). Albeit harmless, the errors asserted in appellant’s third and fourth issues on appeal are not to be repeated. We find no reversible error on these two issues nor any of the remaining issues not discussed hereinabove and affirm as to same.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Soto v. Guardianship of De SotoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995