Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided November 24, 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Dawson A. McQuaig General Counsel City of Jacksonville

QUESTION:

Is s. 231.40(2)(a)4., F.S., as amended by s. 2, ch. 81-174, Laws of Florida, susceptible to retroactive application such that terminal pay benefits paid to resigned or retired Duval County school board employees may now be increased?

SUMMARY:

Section 231.40(2)(a)4., F.S. 1981, cannot be applied retroactively such that the Duval County School Board can extend the new terminal pay benefits provided for by s. 231.40(2)(a)4., to its former employees who resigned or retired or otherwise separated from employment with the school…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Lakeland v. CatinellaSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. Trustees of Tufts College v. Triple R. Ranch, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Neisel v. MoranSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  4. Keystone Water Company, Inc. v. BevisSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. Larson v. Independent Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API