Legal Opinion

Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1999No. 97-2387PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moyer, C J.

The issue to be determined is whether R.C. 5703.37 or 5739.13 is the statute controlling the service of a notice of sales or use tax assessment by the Ohio Department of Taxation upon a corporation. (R.C. 5741.14 makes R.C. 5739.13 applicable to the use tax.) Appellant, Schindler, argues that R.C. 5703.37 controls and that it therefore timely filed its petition for reassessment. Requirements for the service of notices of sales tax assessments on taxpayers and petitions for reassessment are set forth in R.C. 5739.13, which provides:

“(A) * * *
“The commissioner shall give the party…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FrostOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Castellano v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Gahanna-Jefferson Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Smola v. Legeza, Unpublished Decision (12-29-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Starr v. Ohio Dept. Commerce, Div. of Real Estate & Professional LicensingOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Downey v. 610 Morrison Road, L.L.C., 07ap-903 (7-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API