Legal Opinion
In Re Neiheisel
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah
Decided July 26, 1983No. 16-21254PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN E. CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Objections to claimed exemptions have prompted the debtors in these chapter 7 cases to 'challenge the validity of the Utah Exemptions Act 1 under the Constitution of the United States. It is alleged that the Utah law violates the Supremacy Clause of Article VI by frustrating the federal fresh start policy of bankruptcy law. 2
Debtors claim exemptions for an end table, two chairs, an ottoman, a table with four chairs, a nic-nac table, a chair (Neiheis-el); four lamps, a kitchen table and four chairs, a rocker, a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Stellwagen v. ClumSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Wetmore v. MarkoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. SoteloSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Curtis Neal Heape and Billie Jean Heape, Debtors. Curtis Neal Heape and Billie Jean Heape, Debtors-Appellants v. Citadel Bank of IndependenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Odell Lynard Sanders, Debtor. David Dorsey Distributing, Incorporated v. Odell Lynard SandersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- In Re GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Bank of America v. StineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- In Re CrossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.