Legal Opinion

Morris v. Allstate Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant Allstate Insurance Company is obligated to defend the defendants Robert Hester and Nathaniel Hester in an underlying action entitled Morris v Hester, pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, under Index No. 96-16017, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.), entered March 9, 1998, as denied his motion for summary judgment and declared that Allstate Insurance Company is not obligated to defend Robert…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. MugaveroNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Walton v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. In re the Arbitration between Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority & GholsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Panzella v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. YodiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Nationwide General Insurance v. PontoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API