Legal Opinion

People v. Emig

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1991No. Docket 120924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, P.J.

The prosecutor appeals, by leave granted, from a Detroit Recorder’s Court order reversing defendant’s conviction in the 36th District Court for violation of Detroit’s antiprostitution ordinance. Detroit Ordinances, § 38-9-5. He contends that the Recorder’s Court judge erred in ruling that a person has not violated the ordinance unless the person has offered to pay a specific sum of money. We agree with the prosecutor and reinstate the conviction.

The Detroit antiprostitution ordinance states:

It shall be unlawful for any person to . . . offer to engage the services of another person for an act…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. People v. BrooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BudnickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. City of Melvindale v. Trenton Warehouse Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API