People v. Emig
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, P.J.
The prosecutor appeals, by leave granted, from a Detroit Recorder’s Court order reversing defendant’s conviction in the 36th District Court for violation of Detroit’s antiprostitution ordinance. Detroit Ordinances, § 38-9-5. He contends that the Recorder’s Court judge erred in ruling that a person has not violated the ordinance unless the person has offered to pay a specific sum of money. We agree with the prosecutor and reinstate the conviction.
The Detroit antiprostitution ordinance states:
It shall be unlawful for any person to . . . offer to engage the services of another person for an act…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- People v. BrooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BudnickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- City of Melvindale v. Trenton Warehouse Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993