People v. Easterbrook
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The warrant, based upon an affidavit which alleged that heroin was being used and sold in a specified apartment, authorized a search of that apartment, its lessee and “ any other person who may be found to have such property in his possession or under his control or to whom such property may have been delivered ”. The defendant, who was seen, apprehended and searched as he was exiting the apartment, was within the area and class of individuals authorized to be searched (cf. People v. Marshall, 13 N Y 2d 28) and, thus his…
2Cited by20 opinions
- People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HeidelbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- People v. BuffardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. LaskarisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.