Legal Opinion

Ward v. Coleman

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1976No. CIV-76-0303-E, CIV-76-0456-EPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EUBANKS, District Judge.

33 U.S.C. § 1321(b) provides, in pertinent part:

“The discharge of oil or hazardous substances into or upon the navigable waters of the United States ... is prohibited .
“Any owner or operator of any vessel, onshore facility, or offshore facility from which oil or a hazardous substance is discharged . . . shall be assessed a civil penalty ... of not more than $5,000 for each offense. . . . ”

On or about March 23, 1975, oil overflowed from an open-earth pit at a drilling site owned and operated by L. O. Ward and L. O. Ward Oil and Gas Operations…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. California v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Detroit Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hercules Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Marathon Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  4. Ward v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Chevron Oil Company, the California DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API