Legal Opinion

McFarland v. . Patterson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1816PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The court permitted the plaintiff to give parol evidence to support the second count in his declaration, which was for the sale and delivery of a yoke of oxen, cart, and log-chain, and were the principal subjects of the agreement mentioned in the first count. The plaintiff obtained a verdict (after all the evidence of each party was given in) for $15.

A new trial was moved for because the court had permitted parol evidence to be given without sufficient evidence of the loss of the written agreement, which was overruled and appeal taken to this Court. We are of opinion that the loss of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Avery v. Stewart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Linningdale v. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  3. Graham v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Den on Demise of Nicholson v. HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1813
  5. Smith v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Graham v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API