Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Garfield

Utica City Court

Decided May 7, 1970PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold H. Hymes, J.

The defendant is one of six persons charged with violating the following sections of the Penal Law: section 195.05 (obstructing governmental administration); section 240.10 (unlawful assembly), and subdivisions 1, 2, 3 and 6 *80of section 240.20 (disorderly conduct). A motion has been made by the defendant to dismiss each of these informations on the grounds that each fails to allege facts constituting a crime, and is insufficient in form by failing to adequately inform the defendant of the charges against him and the acts constituting the crimes alleged.

The information charging the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Gilbert v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. People v. Turner, New York County Courts1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel Reid and Theodore E. Thomas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. People v. ArvioNew York Justice Court · 1971
  3. People v. BiltstedCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991
  4. People v. JarmainCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1978
  5. People v. SmithCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API