Legal Opinion

Lisner v. . Toplitz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, by permission, from an order the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 7, 1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying á motion to vacate an order for the examination of a judgment debtor in supplementary proceedings and an order appointing a receiver therein.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 7, 1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying á motion to vacate an order for the examination of a judgment debtor in supplementary proceedings and an order appointing a receiver therein. The following question was certified: “ Where on the application of a judgment creditor, an order for the examination of a judgment debtor in proceedings supplementary to execution, instituted under subdivision 1 of section 2432 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is made by…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs,- and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Parker, Ch. J. Absent: O’Brien, J.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dubuc v. Lazell, Dalley & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API